As for science poetry, science or scientific poets like science fiction poets could also publish collections of poetry in nearly any stylistic format. Science or scientific poets, like other poets, will have to know the “art and craft” of poetry, and science or scientific poetry seems in all the poetic types: cost-free verse, blank verse, metrical, rhymed, unrhymed, abstract and concrete, ballad, dramatic monologue, narrative, lyrical, and so forth. All the poetic devices are in use also, from alliteration to apostrophe to pun to irony and understatement, to each and every poetic diction, figures of speech and rhythm, and so forth. Even metaphysical scientific poetry is probable. In his anthology, The Planet Treasury of Physics, Astronomy, and Mathematics, editor Timothy Ferris aptly involves a section entitled “The Poetry of Science.” Says Ferris in the introduction to this section, ” Science (or the ‘natural philosophy’ from which science evolved) has lengthy offered poets with raw material, inspiring some to praise scientific suggestions and other folks to react against them.”
Such greats as Milton, Blake, Wordsworth, Goethe either praised or “excoriated” science and/or a mixture of each. This continued into the twentieth century with such poets as Marianne Moore, T. S. Eliot, Robinson Jeffers, Robert Frost and Robert Hayden (e.g. “Complete Moon”–“the brilliant challenger of rocket authorities”) not to mention numerous of the lesser recognized poets, who nonetheless sustain a poetic response to scientific matters. Says Ferris, “This is not to say that scientists should really attempt to emulate poets, or that poets should really turn proselytes for science….But they will need every single other, and the planet demands each.” Incorporated in his anthology along with the finest scientific prose/essays are the poets Walt Whitman (“When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer”), Gerard Manley Hopkins “(“I am Like a Slip of Comet…”), Emily Dickinson (“Arcturus”), Robinson Jeffers (“Star-Swirls”), Richard Ryan (“Galaxy”), James Clerk Maxwell (“Molecular Evolution”), John Updike (“Cosmic Gall”), Diane Ackerman (“Space Shuttle”) and other folks.
Definitely these writing scientific poetry like these writing science fiction will need not praise all of science, but science nonetheless the topic matter, and there is usually a higher connection in between poetry and science than either poets and/or scientists admit. Creativity and romance can be in each, as can the intellectual and the mathematical. Each can be aesthetic and logical. Or each can be nonaesthetic and nonlogical, based on the sort of science and the sort of poetry.
Science poetry requires it topic from scientific measurements to scientific symbols to time & space to biology to chemistry to physics to astronomy to earth science/geology to meteorology to environmental science to computer system science to engineering/technical science. It could also take its topic from scientists themselves, from Brahmagypta to Einstein, from Galileo to Annie Cannon. It could speak to particular sorts of scientists in basic as Goethe “Correct Adequate: To the Physicist” in the Ferris anthology. (Subsequent poets talked about are also from this anthology.)
Science poetry could make use of numerous types or any kind from lyrical to narrative to sonnet to dramatic monologue to cost-free verse to light verse to haiku to villanelle, from poetry for youngsters or adults or each, for the scientist for the nonscientist or each. John Frederick Nims has written for instance, “The Observatory Ode.” (“The Universe: We’d like to realize.”) There are poems that rhyme, poems that never rhythme. There is “concrete poetry” such as Annie Dillard’s “The Windy Planet” in which the poem in in the shape of a planet, from “pole” to “pole,” an inventive poem. “Chaos Theory” even becomes the topic of poetry as in Wallace Stevens’ “The Connoisseur of Chaos.”
And what of your science and/or scientific poem? Assume of all the approaches of poetry and all the approaches of science. What point of view should really you use? Third particular person? 1st particular person, a dramatic monologue? Does a star speak? Or the universe itself? Does a sound wave speak? Or a micrometer? Can you personify radio astronomy?
What are the key themes, the rhythms? What figures of speech, metaphors, similes, metaphor, can be derived from science. What is your attitude toward science and these scientific matters?
Study. Revise. Assume. Proofread. Revise once more. Shall you create of evolution, of the atom, of magnetism? Of quanta, of the galaxies, of the speed of sound, of the speed of light? Of Kepler’s laws? Shall you create of the history of science? Of scientific news?
Study all the science you can.
Study all the poetry you can.
You are a poet.
You are a scientist.
What have you to say of the astronomer, the comet, of arcturus, of star-sirls, of galaxies, of molecular evolution, of atomic architecture, of “planck time” to allude to other poetic titles.
What does poetry say to science?
What does science say to poetry?